Gimana sih, ini dikirimin teman:
In al-muhala book volume 11 page 224
Ibn Hazem Said :وأما حديث حذيفة فساقط لأنه من طريق الوليد بن جميع وهو هالك ولا نراه يعلم من وضع الحديث فإنه قد روى أخبارا فيها أن أبا بكر وعمر وعثمان وطلحة وسعد بن أبي وقاص رضي الله عنهم أرادوا قتل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وإلقاءه من العقبة في تبوك وهذا هو الكذب الموضوع
Hudhayfa's narration is false because its narrated through al-Waleed bin Jum'ai who is perishable & we don’t see him knows who fabricate the tradition, he narrates some traditions telling that Abu bakr, Umar, Uthman, Talha & Saad bin abi waqas may Allah be pleased on them wanted to murdering the prophet by throwing him from al-qabah (mountain) in Tabook, verily this is a lie & fabricated.
Ibn hazem tried his best to discorrect this tradition, the most powerful point he could depend on to discorrect the tradition is to claim that the narrator al-Waleed bin Jum'ai is unreliable however I say that ibn hazem didn’t succeed in discorrecting the tradition because al-Waleed bin Jum'ai is a reliable narrator according to the Sunni school of thought.
Imam Muslim narrated from him in Sahih Muslim, so he is of Sahih narrators
Imam al-Bukhari narrated from him in al-adab al-mufrad
Imam al-Termidhi narrated from him in Sunnan al-Termidh & correct his narration
Imam Abu Dawoud narrated from him in Sunnan Abi Dawoud
Imam al-Nesaei narrated from him in Sunnan al-Nesaei
Here is some renown Sunni scholars narrates from him & accept his narration.
let us see now what sunni "rijal" scholars said about him:
Ibn Hajar said about him : truthful (seduk)
Al-Dahabi said about him: authenticated (wathkuh)
Al-Ejli said about him : reliable (thiqa)
Ibn Saad said about him: reliable (thiqa)
Abu Hatim said about him: his narration is good (saleh al-hadith)
Ibn Haban mentioned him with the reliable narrators
So we conclude that the tradition is correct & Abu bakr, Umar & Uthman wanted to assassinate the holy prophet according to Sunni school of thought traditions